rigid codes of hierarchical binarism ([info]andypop) wrote,
@ 2005-05-18 13:49:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
This journal is a memorial. New entries cannot be posted to it.
Regular readers will know that Electrelane are my favourite UK band, probably my favourite band anywhere. I first saw them three years ago, not knowing much about them except for a short interview which didn't make them sound particularly interesting. At that show and several subsequent ones, I was flattened by their power. They gave the impression of fashioning some invisible energy-beast out of their collective nerves and fears, like the Id monster in Forbidden Planet.

Early last year I saw them at the Spitz and all shyness was gone. They tore the place up like few bands I've ever seen, full of confidence, blasting their Link-Wray-meets-Neu songs with frightening energy.

Sometime last year their bass player Rachel left, and Ros from Lesbo Pig was asked to join. People who've only seen Ros playing simple guitar chords in Lesbo Pig might be surprised to know that she is a classically-trained multi-instrumentalist. Last week, I finally got to see her play with Electrelane.

It was apparent from the first notes that Ros has had an effect on the band. While keeping the skeletal structures of their music, she has wrapped small intricacies around those bones, and the bass and keyboard play off each other now in a way they didn't before. The combination of this increased delicacy with their brutal energy has taken the band up a level. S, who had scarcely heard them before, was astonished by this show as I had been that first time back in 2002. It was awe-inspiring. My favourite band just got better.



(Post a new comment)


[info]datapanik
2005-05-18 01:17 pm UTC (link)
"blasting their Link-Wray-meets-Neu songs with frightening energy"

You just sold me. Electrane lane are now on my "buy" list.

BTW -- I just reread Everett True's book Live Through This and found a brief reference to Linus.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]andypop
2005-05-18 01:49 pm UTC (link)
1st LP 'Rock It To The Moon' is very soundscapey, swirly 60s organ, crunchy guitars, lots of reverb. 2nd LP 'The Power Out' is really post-punk, bits of Liliput/Raincoats/etc in there, scratchy dry sound. 3rd LP 'Axes' is just out and I am dying to hear it...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]outcognito
2005-05-18 09:50 pm UTC (link)
Was just about to ask for record recommendations, Andy.....and here they are!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]andypop
2005-05-19 12:06 pm UTC (link)
Well, I recommend them all! Probably the second LP is the one to get before actually seeing them - it's more diverse. But the first one is amazing once you've got the bug and need to hear more. They're very different though & I gather the new one is different again.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]andypop
2005-05-18 01:52 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and thanks for the tip. I haven't read ET's books (really wish he'd stick to editing) - what's the context of the Linus mention?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]datapanik
2005-05-18 01:54 pm UTC (link)
He just briefly mentions meeting a friend at a Linus show a few years ago. That's about it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]outcognito
2005-05-18 09:55 pm UTC (link)
What do you think of ET's book?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]datapanik
2005-05-19 01:49 pm UTC (link)
I think ET's portrait of Kurt Cobain is far superior than anything else written about the man (the Charles Cross biography is particularly noxious and without any redeeming value. Of course, that's the one reviewed by the New York Times). I think his opinons can be a bit self-justifying at times, and he needs to ask more difficult questions. But he sticks by the music he likes and disposes hype and industry, so more power to him. He's wrong about Beck, though.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]andypop
2005-05-19 02:12 pm UTC (link)
ET does his own brand of hype (and self-hype) which really bugs me. He's an OK guy an' all but I hope never to read any of his writing ever again. Him and John fucking Robb. It was so disappointing that there was so much of both of them in the otherwise excellent Careless Talk... magazine! I've been avoiding the Plan B mag for the same reason, though people keep telling me I should read it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Plan B
[info]steviecat
2005-05-20 03:38 pm UTC (link)
I buy it more for the excellent illustrations by Andru Clare (I'm Being Good), Rob Ramsden, Lady Lucy and others.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Plan B
[info]andypop
2005-05-20 09:11 pm UTC (link)
Oo is Lucy in it?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]andypop
2005-05-19 02:14 pm UTC (link)
Figures he'd have a good take on Kurt Cobain though, since unlike all the others who've written about him, ET actually was friends with him & Courtney.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]datapanik
2005-05-19 03:06 pm UTC (link)
I think it's more than just the fact that ET knew Cobain. The two "official" biographers, Charles Cross and Michael Azzerad, were both hired by business interests close to the band, and they put a flattering spin on some music industry matters that I think distort the story. Cross is particularly awful in this regard. He treats the independent label scene as a "farm team" for the major labels, dismisses many of Cobain's indie influences entirely (he never mentions Daniel Johnston or the Raincoats, in spite of the fact that Cobain convinced Geffen Records to reissue all three albums of the latter group), and he dismisses Bikini Kill's feminism as "prattle" in one passage (the fact that Cobain took feminism very seriously wasn't an issue for his biographer, apparently). In another bad piece of writing, he pokes fun at the fact that Cobain loved the Knack's second album, never considering that this sort of contradiction (punk rocker enjoying slick pop) could explain a heck of a lot about Nirvana's music. Heck, Cross is more interested in pathology. Cross used to publish a Springsteen fanzine, and I think his major label POV makes him the wrong person to write about Nirvana. But I could write an essay about how much that book gets wrong.

Anyway, to get back to the point, True didn't just know the band. He also has no business ties to Nirvana and wasn't hired to write about them. He has no vested interest in the Cobain "legend" either. And he knows the indie music scene Nirvana came from. Which counts for a lot.

Okay, rant over. Phew!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]andypop
2005-05-19 08:54 pm UTC (link)
Aha, right. Gotcha. I've avoided Cross's book because I'd heard similar things from other people, and Azerrad's because though I enjoyed Our Band Could Be Your Life, his take on music in general isn't that close to mine. So I haven't read & probably won't read any of these, but it's true that ET at least has been in the thick of the scene and is in a position to know what he's talking about, at least...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]datapanik
2005-05-19 09:17 pm UTC (link)
To be fair, Azzerad's book is better, and I'd recommend it. But there is a lot of not-to-interesting background detail on the band's business dealings, and uncritical gloss on the story of the major labels buying into the rock underground (all positive, in Azzerad's view, in this book at least). Given that he was hired by Nirvana's management to write it, it's hard not to connect certain dots.

I loved Our Band, though. I'm thinking he was less compromised in writing that one. The chapters on the Replacements and Dinosaur Jr. are outrageous.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]andypop
2005-05-20 09:26 pm UTC (link)
Here's a thing: according to ET's blog on the Plan B site, he's writing a book specifically about Nirvana.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shangri_lala
2005-05-18 01:35 pm UTC (link)
WOO!

xo

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]andypop
2005-05-18 01:53 pm UTC (link)
WAH!

xx

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…